|
Constitutional Affairs minister, Harriet Harman called for an end to
"excessive, ridiculous bonuses" at the Fabian and Observer Question
Time event on Sunday evening. Disagreeing with minister for the City,
Ed Balls, Harman went on to argue that "Inequality matters. The big gap
between those at the top and those at the bottom makes for a sick
society. I do take the view that we are in the Labour Party because we
don't like to see some people struggling while others are hugely rich."
Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke, however, warned against
viewing the economy as a limited pie to be shared between the nation,
claiming that dynamism in skills and education were far more important
in ensuring equality than regulation of city bonuses. "The truth is we
live in a far more competitive economy than at any time in our history
and the solution is to build up a competitive skills base".
The annual Fabian Question Time event, held on the opening day of
Labour Party Conference and chaired by the Observer's political editor
Gaby Hinsliff, brought together Charles Clarke, Ed Balls, social
exclusion minister, Hilary Armstrong, and the Fabian Society General
Secretary, Sunder Katwala to answer a series of questions submitted by
the audience.
Asked which one issue would be under explored this conference, but
would be crucial in the next ten years, Ed Balls argued for Europe. "As
globalisation becomes a reality, it'll become an increasing issue that
we have policies that can cope with that change".
Pointing out that issues such as climate change and frequently
didn't recognise national borders, Balls argued for putting Europe at
the centre of future policy debates.
But it was not just the expediency of Europe in policy terms that
made it an issue for the coming years, said Balls. "The fundamental
fact about this conference, and this party is that we're not divided
about Europe, unlike the Tories. These debates are going to be
happening in Europe, the idea that you can withdraw and align yourself
with the misogynists and extremists, is not credible, and over the next
few years we need to expose that."
While Charles Clarke made the case for the environment, Hilary
Armstrong also warned of the dangers of globalisation, particularly the
effect it could have on the most vulnerable. The answer, she claimed,
was to keep on reforming public services, personalising them to ensure
that they engaged the most disadvantaged, enabling them to reap the
benefits. "This is a debate we have been neglecting," Armstrong
claimed, "and we can't afford to, or a whole generation will be wiped
out."
Reiterating his comments at last year's Fabian/Observer question
time, Balls called again for a "stable and orderly transition".
Referring to the turbulent summer recess, he went on to recognise that
"The last few weeks have not been stable or orderly, or good for
transition". Like other senior Labour figures, Balls went on to call
for a debate about the future direction of the party, but warned:
"Don't use the idea of a debate to say that there is fundamental divide
between New Labour and everyone else. There is no reason why mainstream
Labour cannot debate without it being factional and divisive. This is
far more important than when the handover takes place'. |