The future of the left since 1884

A wake-up call

Labour has a proud history on LGBT+ equality but is our own house really in order, asks Joe Vinson



Equalising the age of consent, civil partnerships, lifting the ban on LGBT+ people serving in the military, repealing section 28, opening up adoption to same-sex couples, the Gender Recognition Act, the Equality Act – the list of Labour achievements is an impressive one.

And with that proud record, we, as Labour members, might be tempted to think that LGBT+ equality is achieved. There is no doubt that legislative change has changed the lives of millions of LGBT+ people, but social change is much harder to come by. Acceptance, affirmation, pride and even love, sadly cannot be legislated for. LGBT+ friendly public attitudes and public services require us to diligently and consistently strive for equality.

In a recent study by GALOP, the LGBT+ hate crime charity, one in five people said they wouldn’t want an LGB neighbour – rising to one in four when they were asked whether they would want a trans neighbour. Hate crime has risen every year for five years, doubling in the last year, with two-thirds of LGBT+ people saying they have experienced abuse in some form.

 These are shocking statistics, but what they tell us is that legislative change alone is not enough to achieve LGBT+ equality. That applies inside the Labour party as much as it does in the ‘real world’.

The Fabian Society has produced a report on the experiences of individuals, including LGBT+ people, of Labour party membership – and it makes for disheartening reading.

It tells a story where a significant number of LGBT+ people are still facing barriers in the party, from the culture of their CLP meetings right through to standing for parliamentary selection.

Fifty three per cent of LGBT+ members disagreed that everyone in their local party is friendly and welcoming, with only Jewish members disagreeing at a greater percentage. LGBT+ members were also more likely to say they did not enjoy attending meetings of their constituency or branch, with 34 per cent of LGBT+ members thinking that their community would not be treated fairly in their local party.

It is also clear that the experience LGBT+ members have in their local parties is affecting the contribution they feel able to give to them. Citing reasons why they had not held a position in their local party, 14 per cent of LGBT+ respondents felt excluded by the current officers, did not think the process would be fair on LGBT+ people, and had never been asked to stand. Nineteen per cent of LGBT+ members even said that they had been disadvantaged in a party election because of their identity.

The report also explores the experience of LGBT+ people standing in selections, and whilst most people were positive about their experience, there are some concerning trends. 

One in five respondents said they had experienced a disadvantage for being LGBT+ in a local government selection, with almost one in four stating their private life had come under unwelcome scrutiny. In parliamentary selections, almost half of LGBT+ respondents felt they wouldn’t be supported or encouraged through the process.

There is no doubt that many LGBT+ people enjoy their experience as Labour party members, with hundreds going on to become elected representatives at all levels of the party and government – but we cannot hide from these troubling statistics behind our success stories. This is especially the case for our trans communities, where a lack of role models makes championing trans equality difficult, further discouraging people from standing. 

 For any LGBT+ member to feel excluded from selection or even just their local party is a stain on our great record, and we have got to tackle it head on.

There are however simple steps we can take to create more inclusive environments for LGBT+ members in our party.

Every CLP should have an LGBT+ officer. Hundreds of CLPs either have not introduced them, and some that do have filled them with straight cisgender people – that has got to change. However, LGBT+ members should be encouraged and welcomed into any leadership position, not just pigeonholed into LGBT+ positions.

More ambitiously, the Labour party nationally needs to provide resources to CLPs, training them on how to create inclusive environments for LGBT+ members – empowering those in leadership positions to recognise LGBT-phobia, and more importantly to offer a robust response when they do.

To support this work, the party should work with LGBT+ Labour to develop a kitemark for CLPs, supporting them to introduce LGBT+ inclusive practices, and produce an annual inclusivity report to monitor the experiences and successes of marginalised groups in the party.

 Underpinning that, the Labour party has long promised LGBT+ members a training programme for future candidates – it now just needs to get on and deliver it. With a startling lack of LGBT+ women, disabled people, BAME people and trans people as role models, it is crucial we take an approach which uplifts those LGBT+ people facing exclusion in our communities.

Simply put, this report is a wake-up call for those who think that equality has been achieved and that LGBT+ issues are a distraction. For those of us on the front lines, it only confirms the sober situation LGBT+ members find ourselves in. If we choose to ignore the problem, our party, and the wider labour movement, will only suffer as a consequence.


Joe Vinson

Joe Vinson is national secretary of LGBT+ Labour and secretary of the Socialist Societies.


Fabian membership

Join the Fabian Society today and help shape the future of the left

You’ll receive the quarterly Fabian Review and at least four reports or pamphlets each year sent to your door

Be a part of the debate at Fabian conferences and events and join one of our network of local Fabian societies

Join the Fabian Society
Fabian Society

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.